From: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Reports from SSD purgatory |
Date: | 2011-08-15 23:49:52 |
Message-ID: | 4E49B0A0.2060705@2ndQuadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
News update for anyone else who's trapped like me, waiting for a fix to
the Intel 320 SSD bug where they can truncate themselves to 8MB. Over
the weekend Intel has announced a firmware fix for the problem is done,
and is due to ship "within the next two weeks":
http://communities.intel.com/thread/24121
On the larger SSD reliability front, Tom's Hardware surveyed heavy SSD
users they're friendly with who use Intel drives. The most interesting
data came from Softlayer:
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/ssd-reliability-failure-rate,2923-6.html
This supports two claims I made before based on my private data that
were controversial:
-Annualized SSD failure rates are not significantly lower than
traditional drives in the first couple of years. Jury is still out on
whether they will spike upwards starting at 3 years as mechanical ones do.
-The most common source of dead drives is sudden, catastrophic
electronics failure. These are not predicted by SMART, and have nothing
to do with hitting the drive's wear limits.
--
Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.us
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Boreham | 2011-08-16 04:13:51 | Re: Reports from SSD purgatory |
Previous Message | Greg Smith | 2011-08-15 20:36:49 | Re: strange pgbench results (as if blocked at the end) |