On 12/08/2011 17:26, George MacKerron wrote:
> Many thanks for the reply, Ray.
>
> Unfortunately, I don't think this addresses the problem, because I'd
> hoped not to have to hard-code the table name into the function.
>
> The point of the function is that you can pass it any table name
> (along with some other parameters) and it returns rows from that
> named table.
OK, fair enough.... but what exactly are you trying to do that a simple
SELECT won't do?
Ray.
--
Raymond O'Donnell :: Galway :: Ireland
rod(at)iol(dot)ie