From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Tim Bunce <Tim(dot)Bunce(at)pobox(dot)com>, Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: plperl crash with Debian 6 (64 bit), pl/perlu, libwww and https |
Date: | 2011-08-10 16:44:55 |
Message-ID: | 4E42B587.5040202@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 08/09/2011 04:32 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan<andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>> On 08/09/2011 12:22 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> No. As I pointed out upthread, the instant somebody changes the SIGALRM
>>> handler to a non-Postgres-aware one, you are already at risk of failure.
>>> Setting it back later is just locking the barn door after the horses
>>> left. Institutionalizing such a non-fix globally is even worse.
>> So what's your suggestion? I know what you said you'd like, but it
>> doesn't appear at all practical to me.
> [ shrug... ] Installing a perl module that mucks with the signal
> handlers is in the "don't do that" category. A kluge such as you
> suggest will not get it out of that category; all it will do is add
> useless overhead for people who are following the rules.
>
>
Well, knowing what a given module might do isn't always easy (see
below). I don't much like saying to people "I told you so", especially
when following the advice isn't necessarily straightforward.
After some experimentation, I found that, at least on my system, if LWP
uses Crypt::SSLeay for https requests then it sets an alarm handler, but
if instead it uses IO::Socket::SSL an alarm handler is not set. So the
answer to the OP's original problem is probably "make sure you have
IO::Socket::SSL installed and that Crypt::SSLeay is not installed."
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David E. Wheeler | 2011-08-10 17:01:43 | Re: Policy on pulling in code from other projects? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-08-10 16:41:51 | Re: Reduced power consumption in autovacuum launcher process |