| From: | Craig Ringer <ringerc(at)ringerc(dot)id(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | Mridul Mathew <mridulmathew(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | rajeshwarbharathi(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: FW: Character set equivalent for AL32UTF8 |
| Date: | 2011-08-10 13:55:44 |
| Message-ID: | 4E428DE0.8000606@ringerc.id.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On 10/08/2011 4:07 PM, Mridul Mathew wrote:
> Does PostgreSQL make a distinction within Unicode in a similar fashion?
No.
> We have not tested our Oracle al32utf8 databases on PostgreSQL, but
> while creating databases in PostgreSQL, we see UTF8 as an option, but
> not al32.
al32utf8 is Oracle specific and doesn't seem to be defined anywhere else.
What _application_ _level_ impact does this have for you? What changes
do your apps expect to see in their use of or communication with the
database?
I strongly suggest that you _test_ this in Pg and see.
--
Craig Ringer
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2011-08-10 14:04:44 | Re: postgresql server crash on windows 7 when using plpython |
| Previous Message | Craig Ringer | 2011-08-10 13:51:47 | Re: Postgresql 9.0.1 installation error |