From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pasman pasmański <pasman(dot)p(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Problem with sources. |
Date: | 2011-08-09 13:49:30 |
Message-ID: | 4E413AEA.50200@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 08/09/2011 09:22 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> On 08/09/2011 09:10 AM, pasman pasmański wrote:
>> When i try to fetch sources via git, there is an error:
>>
>> error: Unable to find 676e3c735dec32ba0448fdd0faf9ace37c1fa792 under
>> http://git.postgresql.org/git/postgresql.git
>> Cannot obtain needed object 676e3c735dec32ba0448fdd0faf9ace37c1fa792
>> error: Fetch failed.
>>
>>
>> How to get current branch ?
>
>
> I always use the git protocol, which is working fine:
>
> [andrew(at)ophelia ~]$ git clone
> git://git.postgresql.org/git/postgresql.git ntestpg
> Cloning into ntestpg...
> remote: Counting objects: 418000, done.
> remote: Compressing objects: 100% (78367/78367), done.
> remote: Total 418000 (delta 348625), reused 406551 (delta 337799)
> Receiving objects: 100% (418000/418000), 119.93 MiB | 1.13 MiB/s,
> done.
> Resolving deltas: 100% (348625/348625), done.
>
>
I just tested cloning over http, and it worked fine for me, although it
took a while.
You can also pull from the clone at github, which is kept pretty up to
date, and probably has better bandwidth, using
git://github.com/postgres/postgres.git or
https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Florian Pflug | 2011-08-09 14:34:00 | Re: WIP fix proposal for bug #6123 |
Previous Message | Joe Abbate | 2011-08-09 13:49:12 | Re: Selecting user-defined CASTs |