Re: Reduce WAL logging of INSERT SELECT

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Reduce WAL logging of INSERT SELECT
Date: 2011-08-06 16:05:28
Message-ID: 4E3D6648.7020807@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 06.08.2011 13:13, Simon Riggs wrote:
> I think we should remove the COPY optimisation because of this and
> definitely not extend INSERT SELECT to perform it automatically.

It can be very helpful when loading a lot of data, so I'm not in favor
of removing it altogether. Maybe WAL-log the first 10000 rows or such
normally, and skip WAL after that. Of course, loading 10001 rows becomes
the worst case then, but something along those lines...

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jaime Casanova 2011-08-06 16:13:27 Re: Reduce WAL logging of INSERT SELECT
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-08-06 15:05:58 Re: cataloguing NOT NULL constraints