| From: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Konstantin Izmailov <pgfizm(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: why cannot UNION both SELECT and SHOW? |
| Date: | 2011-08-01 21:12:50 |
| Message-ID: | 4E3716D2.6030902@gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 08/01/2011 02:07 PM, Konstantin Izmailov wrote:
> Is it possible instead of executing following two statements:
> SHOW search_path; SELECT version();
> to execute just one statement returning both search_path and version?
>
> I'm using Postgres 9.0 and need the result either as two tuples or two
> fields...
>
> Could you suggest how to rewrite the two statements?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/interactive/functions-info.html
production=> select current_schemas('f'),version();
current_schemas |
version
--------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
{public,utility,history} | PostgreSQL 9.0.3 on i686-pc-linux-gnu,
compiled by GCC gcc (Ubuntu 4.4.3-4ubuntu5) 4.4.3, 32-bit
>
> Thx
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rodrigo Gonzalez | 2011-08-01 21:12:51 | Re: why cannot UNION both SELECT and SHOW? |
| Previous Message | Konstantin Izmailov | 2011-08-01 21:07:04 | why cannot UNION both SELECT and SHOW? |