From: | "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
---|---|
To: | "Juan Cuervo (Quality Telecom)" <juanrcuervo(at)quality-telecom(dot)net>, "Bob Lunney" <bob_lunney(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: revoked permissions on table still allows users to see table's structure |
Date: | 2011-07-22 14:33:21 |
Message-ID: | 4E2943E1020000250003F6D7@gw.wicourts.gov |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Bob Lunney <bob_lunney(at)yahoo(dot)com> wrote:
> That is what schemas, permissions and search paths are for.
I don't think those do as much as you're giving them credit for:
test=> set session authorization dee_ny;
SET
test=> \d
List of relations
Schema | Name | Type | Owner
---------+------+-------+---------
public | a | table | kgrittn
public | b | table | kgrittn
seethat | open | table | kgrittn
(3 rows)
test=> \dt seewhat.*
List of relations
Schema | Name | Type | Owner
---------+--------+-------+---------
seewhat | closed | table | kgrittn
(1 row)
test=> \d seewhat.closed
Table "seewhat.closed"
Column | Type | Modifiers
-----------+---------+-----------
closed_id | integer |
I don't think I've used any database where the *structure* of
database objects was hidden from someone connected to the database.
There are typically system tables of some sort to which all
authorized users in the database have read-only access. The
parallel I would draw in the "real world" is that the format of the
forms which are required for adoption in the Wisconsin court system
are a matter of public record -- anybody can see the blank forms.
Getting a look at data which has been entered onto such forms is a
very different matter.
If you want to hide the structure of the tables from a person, you
need to deny that person authority to connect to the database. You
can always allow such a person to connect to an application which
you are running in a trusted environment.
-Kevin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Cédric Villemain | 2011-07-22 15:49:03 | Re: Followup on 'Standby promotion does not work' |
Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2011-07-22 14:14:26 | Re: Followup on 'Standby promotion does not work' |