From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Hardware advice for scalable warehouse db |
Date: | 2011-07-15 19:46:16 |
Message-ID: | 4E209908.8010500@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On 7/14/11 11:34 PM, chris wrote:
> Any comments on the configuration? Any experiences with iSCSI vs. Fibre
> Channel for SANs and PostgreSQL? If the SAN setup sucks, do you see a
> cheap alternative how to connect as many as 16 x 2TB disks as DAS?
Here's the problem with iSCSI: on gigabit ethernet, your maximum
possible throughput is 100mb/s, which means that your likely maximum
database throughput (for a seq scan or vacuum, for example) is 30mb/s.
That's about a third of what you can get with good internal RAID.
While multichannel iSCSI is possible, it's hard to configure, and
doesn't really allow you to spread a *single* request across multiple
channels. So: go with fiber channel if you're using a SAN.
iSCSI also has horrible lag times, but you don't care about that so much
for DW.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | lars | 2011-07-15 21:40:53 | Re: Statistics and Multi-Column indexes |
Previous Message | Rob Wultsch | 2011-07-15 19:25:31 | Re: Hardware advice for scalable warehouse db |