Re: pg_class.relistemp

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_class.relistemp
Date: 2011-07-14 22:06:25
Message-ID: 4E1F6861.3080203@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


>> I don't agree that having comprehensive system views with multi-version
>> stability would be a "hack".
>
> If we had that, it wouldn't be a hack. Putting in a hack to cover the
> specific case of relistemp, on the other hand, is just a hack.

I agree.

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Boley 2011-07-14 22:13:10 Patch Review: Collect frequency statistics and selectivity estimation for arrays
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-07-14 22:05:00 Re: pg_class.relistemp