Re: pg_class.relistemp

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_class.relistemp
Date: 2011-07-14 20:26:13
Message-ID: 4E1F0A95020000250003F349@gw.wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"David E. Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> wrote:

> A deprecation cycle at least might be useful.

How about a "relistemp" extension on pgxn.org for the "generated
column" function to provide the backward compatibility? Is the new
extension mechanism a sane way to help those who need a phase-out
period?

-Kevin

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2011-07-14 20:35:02 Re: patch: enhanced get diagnostics statement 2
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2011-07-14 20:25:56 Re: patch: enhanced get diagnostics statement 2