From: | "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
---|---|
To: | "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>,"Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Florian Pflug" <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Need help understanding pg_locks |
Date: | 2011-07-11 16:04:27 |
Message-ID: | 4E1AD8BB020000250003F1A3@gw.wicourts.gov |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> OK, so as I understand it, in pg_locks:
>
> Column | Type | Modifiers
> --------------------+----------+-----------
> locktype | text |
> database | oid |
> relation | oid |
> page | integer |
> tuple | smallint |
> virtualxid | text |
> transactionid | xid |
> classid | oid |
> objid | oid |
> objsubid | smallint |
>
> virtualtransaction | text |
> pid | integer |
> mode | text |
> granted | boolean |
>
> It is the last four that are related to the "locking entity".
> vaguely represented the locked object.
I think more accurately:
Information about the lock requester:
virtualtransaction, pid
Information about what is being locked:
database, relation, page, tuple, virtualxid, transactionid, classid,
objid, objsubid (where NULL means "not applicable to this lock)
Information about the lock itself:
locktype, mode, granted
-Kevin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2011-07-11 16:14:25 | Re: Full GUID support |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2011-07-11 15:58:20 | remove README.mb.jp and README.mb.big5? |