Re: Full GUID support

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Full GUID support
Date: 2011-07-10 18:59:05
Message-ID: 4E19F679.4000203@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 7/3/11 2:02 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Yeah. If there were One True Way to create a UUID, I would probably
> agree that we should push that functionality into core. But there are
> a lot of ways (and the reason for that is that they all suck in one
> fashion or another :-(). Between that and the lack of portability of
> many of the better ways, this is something I'm happy to keep at arm's
> length.

Also, I think that UUIDs fall into the class of "datatypes used by less
than 10% of users" which should always remain extensions. I'd consider
CITEXT for core before UUID.

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2011-07-10 19:29:32 Re: Extra check in 9.0 exclusion constraint unintended consequences
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2011-07-10 18:44:28 Re: Re: patch review : Add ability to constrain backend temporary file space