Re: Parameterized aggregate subquery (was: Pull up aggregate subquery)

From: Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Parameterized aggregate subquery (was: Pull up aggregate subquery)
Date: 2011-07-09 15:45:34
Message-ID: 4E18779E.4030200@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2011-07-09 16:23, Hitoshi Harada wrote:
> 2011/7/5 Hitoshi Harada<umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>> 2011/7/5 Yeb Havinga<yebhavinga(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>>> Hello Hitosh, list,
>>>
>>>>> Attached is revised version.
>>>> I failed to attached the patch. I'm trying again.
>>>>
>>> I'm currently unable to test, since on holiday. I'm happy to continue
>>> testing once returned but it may not be within the bounds of the current
>>> commitfest, sorry.
>> Thanks for replying. Regarding the time remained until the end of this
>> commitfest, I'd think we should mark this item "Returned with
>> Feedback" if no objection appears. I will be very happy if Yeb tests
>> my latest patch after he comes back. I'll make up my mind around
>> regression test.
> It seems that Yeb marked "Returned with Feedback". Thanks for the
> review again. Still, I'd appreciate if further review is done on my
> latest patch.

Yes, I did so after you suggested to return it to feedback. I'll review
your latest patch as soon as there is enough time to do a proper review,
which is probably after next week.

regards,
Yeb Havinga

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Kupershmidt 2011-07-09 17:16:37 psql: display of object comments
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2011-07-09 15:29:58 Re: Extra check in 9.0 exclusion constraint unintended consequences