From: | Jonathan <jonathan(at)kc8onw(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Slow query when using ORDER BY *and* LIMIT |
Date: | 2011-07-08 22:23:41 |
Message-ID: | 4E17836D.9070201@kc8onw.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Does anyone have any suggestions for my problem? (I have to wonder if
I'm somehow just not getting peoples attention or what. This is my
second question this week on a public mailing list that has gotten
exactly 0 replies)
Jonathan
On 7/5/2011 8:18 PM, Jonathan wrote:
> I have a query that uses ORDER BY and LIMIT to get a set of image data
> rows that match a given tag. When both ORDER BY and LIMIT are included
> for some reason the planner chooses a very slow query plan. Dropping one
> or the other results in a much faster query going from 4+ seconds -> 30
> ms. Database schema, EXPLAIN ANALYZE and other information can be found
> at http://pgsql.privatepaste.com/31113c27bf Is there a way to convince
> the planner to use the faster plan when doing both ORDER BY and LIMIT
> without using SET options or will I need to disable the slow plan
> options to force the planner to use the fast plan?
>
> I found some stuff in the mailing list archives that looks related but I
> didn't see any fixes. Apparently the planner hopes the merge join will
> find the LIMIT # of rows fairly quickly but instead it winds up scanning
> almost the entire table.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2011-07-09 00:40:23 | Re: execution time for first INSERT |
Previous Message | Anish Kejariwal | 2011-07-08 21:36:48 | issue with query optimizer when joining two partitioned tables |