From: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
Cc: | rhaas(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Adjust OLDSERXID_MAX_PAGE based on BLCKSZ. |
Date: | 2011-07-08 12:57:52 |
Message-ID: | 4E16FED0.5010405@enterprisedb.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 08.07.2011 15:22, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>
>> I'm getting a bunch of warnings on Windows related to this:
>
>>> .\src\backend\storage\lmgr\predicate.c(768): warning C4307: '+' :
>>> integral constant overflow
>
> The part of the expression which is probably causing this:
>
> (MaxTransactionId + 1) / OLDSERXID_ENTRIESPERPAGE - 1
>
> Which I fear may not be getting into overflow which will not do the
> right thing even where there is no warning. :-(
>
> Would it be safe to assume that integer division would do the right
> thing if we drop both of the "off by one" adjustments and use?:
>
> MaxTransactionId / OLDSERXID_ENTRIESPERPAGE
Hmm, that seems more correct to me anyway. We are trying to calculate
which page xid MaxTransactionId would be stored on, if the SLRU didn't
have a size limit. You calculate that with simply MaxTransactionId /
OLDSERXID_ENTRIESPERPAGE.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Kupershmidt | 2011-07-08 13:01:39 | Re: patch: Allow \dd to show constraint comments |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2011-07-08 12:40:00 | Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death on both win32 and Unix |