| From: | Brar Piening <brar(at)gmx(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Review of VS 2010 support patches |
| Date: | 2011-07-07 22:35:57 |
| Message-ID: | 4E1634CD.90901@gmx.de |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Review of VS 2010 support patches
From: Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Brar Piening <brar(at)gmx(dot)de>
Date: 07.07.2011 16:44
>
> Frankly, I suggest leaving these tests for the buildfarm to sort out.
> I don't see any sign of build process issues; they all build fine, and
> it's pretty darn unlikely that build changes would cause them to break
> at runtime. Windows buildfarm coverage looks pretty decent these days.
As I had no Idea whether the buildfarm is even ready to work with VS
2010 I set out and tested it.
I can happily tell you that I have just now completed my first
successful buildfarm run using the attached build-farm.conf
Regards,
Brar
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| build-farm.conf | text/plain | 9.6 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jun Ishiduka | 2011-07-08 01:22:20 | Re: Online base backup from the hot-standby |
| Previous Message | Noah Misch | 2011-07-07 22:35:28 | Re: [v9.2] Fix leaky-view problem, part 2 |