From: | "Birchall, Austen" <austen(dot)birchall(at)metoffice(dot)gov(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | Luca Ferrari <fluca1978(at)infinito(dot)it> |
Cc: | "pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Running psql commands from a remote location & pg_hba.conf? |
Date: | 2013-08-05 15:46:03 |
Message-ID: | 4E154FB60786D74BB4DFDC97BF991CAC0761A9@EXXCMPD1DAG2.cmpd1.metoffice.gov.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-novice |
Hi Luca
And thanks once again for your assistance. Yes a role would work although I would have to remember to add any new users to it as they are created.
I guess one of the questions I am asking is:
Is there a way to run psql scripts in a database fired off from a remote location without going down the trust authentication 'route' in pg_hba.conf?
Austen
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Birchall, Austen wrote:
> Am I right to presume that I have to change pg_hba.conf to
>
> host db1 monitor 123.0.0.1/32 trust
> host db1 user1 123.0.0.1/32 ident
> host db1 user2 123.0.0.1/32 ident
>
> then continue this format with individual entries for all the users in db1?
Not sure this is what you are looking for, but why not defining a role that contains all the users and then add a single entry related to such role?
See http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/auth-pg-hba-conf.html -> user
Luca
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Luca Ferrari | 2013-08-06 06:11:31 | Re: Running psql commands from a remote location & pg_hba.conf? |
Previous Message | Luca Ferrari | 2013-08-05 15:30:44 | Re: Running psql commands from a remote location & pg_hba.conf? |