Re: Performance Monitoring of PostGRE

From: John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Performance Monitoring of PostGRE
Date: 2011-07-06 16:53:56
Message-ID: 4E149324.8080701@hogranch.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 07/06/11 6:42 AM, Bill Moran wrote:
> FYI, to follow up on another post. "postgre" is not really an acceptable
> shortening of PostgreSQL. "postgres" is generally accepted, although there
> seem to be some people who dislike that as well. "PG" or "PGSQL" also seem
> to be generally accepted shortenings of the name, but for some reason
> there seem to be a lot of people who dislike "postgre".

indeed, since the etymology(?) of the name is Ingres -> Postgres ->
PostgreSQL

--
john r pierce N 37, W 122
santa cruz ca mid-left coast

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2011-07-06 19:41:02 Re: Performance Monitoring of PostGRE
Previous Message Steve Francis 2011-07-06 16:28:30 Re: Performance Monitoring of PostGRE