| From: | Darren Duncan <darren(at)darrenduncan(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Nolan <htfoot(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: An amusing MySQL weakness--not! |
| Date: | 2011-06-26 07:05:58 |
| Message-ID: | 4E06DA56.8030905@darrenduncan.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Michael Nolan wrote:
> Earlier today I was working on a MySQL database (not by choice, I assure
> you),
> and I typed a statement like this:
>
> Update tablexyz set field1 = '15' where field2 - 20;
>
> The '-' was supposed to be an equal sign, but MySQL executed it anyway.
> (Field2 is an integer.)
>
> I was not amused.
>
> PostgreSQL reports this as an error, of course.
I assume MySQL accepts this because it, like SQLite, doesn't have a real BOOLEAN
type and instead uses INTEGER for its truth values, I believe.
The result of any "foo = bar" is an INTEGER anyway, I believe, in such DBMSs,
same as "field2 - 20", and so if its result is nonzero, that is treated as TRUE.
Sure, that's inane, but for this one I would place a lot of blame on the SQL
standard, because it doesn't mandate BOOLEAN support, just making it optional,
and so lots of SQL DBMSs don't require BOOLEAN as the type of a WHERE expression.
Having real BOOLEAN is just one of the reasons I like Postgres the most.
-- Darren Duncan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Vincent Veyron | 2011-06-26 14:11:06 | Re: An amusing MySQL weakness--not! |
| Previous Message | Gavin Flower | 2011-06-26 05:43:26 | Re: An amusing MySQL weakness--not! |