Re: FOR KEY LOCK foreign keys

From: Jesper Krogh <jesper(at)krogh(dot)cc>
To: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>
Subject: Re: FOR KEY LOCK foreign keys
Date: 2011-06-21 04:50:44
Message-ID: 4E002324.3000608@krogh.cc
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2011-06-20 22:11, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 06:30:41PM +0200, Jesper Krogh wrote:
>> I hope this hasn't been forgotten. But I cant see it has been committed
>> or moved
>> into the commitfest process?
> If you're asking about that main patch for $SUBJECT rather than those
> isolationtester changes specifically, I can't speak to the plans for it. I
> wasn't planning to move the test suite work forward independent of the core
> patch it serves, but we could do that if there's another application.
Yes, I was actually asking about the main patch for foreign key locks.

Jesper
--
Jesper

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2011-06-21 04:59:44 Re: Fwd: Keywords in pg_hba.conf should be field-specific
Previous Message Brendan Jurd 2011-06-21 04:44:29 Re: Fwd: Keywords in pg_hba.conf should be field-specific