From: | "F(dot) BROUARD / SQLpro" <sqlpro(at)club-internet(dot)fr> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Search for lists |
Date: | 2011-06-19 19:05:54 |
Message-ID: | 4DFE4892.1090004@club-internet.fr |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Le 18/06/2011 23:51, Daron Ryan a écrit :
>
> Hello,
>
> I need to search a table to find sets of rows that have a column
> matching itself for the whole set and another column matching row for
> row with a list I am going to supply. The result I should receive should
> be value of the column that matches itself.
>
> For example given the following data in my table:
>
> 3; 1
> 3; 2
> 4; 8
> 4; 9
> 4; 10
>
> I might need to search for 1,2. This should produce the result 3. Or if
> I were to search for 8, 9, 10 the result should be 4. Searching for 8, 9
> should produce an empty result as should 8, 9, 10, 11.
>
> Can anyone recommend a strategy?
>
this is a general case of relationnal division.
One way to do this is :
WITH
T0 AS
(SELECT 1 AS N --> all the data to be search each on a separate SELECT
UNION ALL --> with UNION ALL
SELECT 2 AS N)
SELECT TBL_ID
FROM T_MY_TABLE_TBL AS T
INNER JOIN T0
ON T.TBL_VALUE = T0.N
GROUP BY TBL_ID
HAVING COUNT(*) = (SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM T0);
I you read french, I wrote a paper on the relational division :
http://sqlpro.developpez.com/cours/divrelationnelle/
A +
--
Frédéric BROUARD - expert SGBDR et SQL - MVP SQL Server - 06 11 86 40 66
Le site sur le langage SQL et les SGBDR : http://sqlpro.developpez.com
Enseignant Arts & Métiers PACA, ISEN Toulon et CESI/EXIA Aix en Provence
Audit, conseil, expertise, formation, modélisation, tuning, optimisation
*********************** http://www.sqlspot.com *************************
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Cédric Villemain | 2011-06-19 19:56:44 | Re: PostgreSQL 8.4.8 bringing my website down every evening |
Previous Message | F. BROUARD / SQLpro | 2011-06-19 18:56:38 | Re: Referencing function value inside CASE..WHEN |