| From: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dan Ports <drkp(at)csail(dot)mit(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
| Subject: | Re: patch: update README-SSI |
| Date: | 2011-06-16 17:58:15 |
| Message-ID: | 4DFA4437.2010907@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 16.06.2011 20:33, Dan Ports wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 04:39:09PM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> There's no mention on what T1 is. I believe it's supposed to be Tin, in
>> the terminology used in the graph.
>
> Yes, I changed the naming after I originally wrote it, and missed a
> couple spots. T1 should be Tin.
>
>> I don't see how there can be a ww-dependency between T0 and Tin. There
>> can't be a rw-conflict because Tin is read-only, so surely there can't
>> be a ww-conflict either?
>
> Yes, it can only be a wr-conflict. Good catch.
Ok, I'll commit with those changes.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-06-16 18:00:34 | Re: planinstr, showing planner time on EXPLAIN |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-06-16 17:54:55 | Re: Boolean operators without commutators vs. ALL/ANY |