From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: wrong message on REASSIGN OWNED |
Date: | 2011-06-13 14:14:09 |
Message-ID: | 4DF61B31.5020404@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 06/13/2011 09:55 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas<robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 2:41 AM, Jaime Casanova<jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>> btw, i'm allowed to use ALTER TABLE to assign a new owner (even an
>>> unprivileged one) to a system catalog, probably that's a bug.
>> +1 for tightening that up in 9.2.
> Nonsense. You won't like the results of "DELETE FROM pg_proc;" either,
> but we don't try to put training wheels on superusers.
Yeah. Amusing anecdote along these lines: I had fun recently recovering
the situation for someone who had for reasons I can't even imagine done
"delete from pg_database;" on their production system.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2011-06-13 14:19:33 | Re: Boolean operators without commutators vs. ALL/ANY |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-06-13 14:07:17 | Re: Boolean operators without commutators vs. ALL/ANY |