| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Radosław Smogura <rsmogura(at)softperience(dot)eu>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: .gitignore for some of cygwin files |
| Date: | 2011-06-09 13:40:13 |
| Message-ID: | 4DF0CD3D.3040700@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 06/09/2011 08:12 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:34, Radosław Smogura<rsmogura(at)softperience(dot)eu> wrote:
>> After compilation I got big list of differences about binaries and other
>> files. You may see it in patch.
> Hmm. Does this really affect just cygwin, and not also mingw?
Yes, indeed.
> I know
> msvc builds out-of-tree, but mingw doesn't, iirc? WHere do the EXEs go
> there?
The .exe files go exactly where linked executables go on Unix. We could
add .gitignore lines for them just as we have for Unix, e.g. by adding
"/initdb.exe" to src/bin/initdb.gitignore, or more simply by adding a
global rule for "*.exe" as the patch proposes.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Radosław Smogura | 2011-06-09 13:40:52 | Re: .gitignore for some of cygwin files |
| Previous Message | Radosław Smogura | 2011-06-09 13:36:35 | Re: .gitignore for some of cygwin files |