From: | Marc Cousin <cousinmarc(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
Cc: | Satoshi Nagayasu <satoshi(dot)nagayasu(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: ECPG, sentence not complete |
Date: | 2011-06-04 16:52:12 |
Message-ID: | 4DEA62BC.1080009@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On 06/03/2011 08:30 PM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Satoshi Nagayasu <satoshi(dot)nagayasu(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> I think it should be rewritten as following:
>> ---------------------------------------------------------
>> If the query returns more than one records, multiple linked
>> SQLDA structures are returned, and <literal>desc_next</>
>> holds a pointer to the next element (record) in the list.
>> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> "more than one records" isn't right -- it could be "multiple
> records" or "more than one record".
>
> -Kevin
Hi, I've found another problem in ECPG's doc:
<varlistentry>
<term><literal>ECPG_INFORMIX_DATE_CONVERT</></term>
<listitem>
<para>
Functions return this value if Internally it is defined to -1210
(the
<productname>Informix</productname> definition).
</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
<varlistentry>
<term><literal>ECPG_INFORMIX_OUT_OF_MEMORY</></term>
<listitem>
<para>
Functions return this value if Internally it is defined to -1211
(the
<productname>Informix</productname> definition).
</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
There are a few words missing.
Cheers
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2011-06-04 19:12:14 | Re: ECPG, sentence not complete |
Previous Message | Thom Brown | 2011-06-04 13:36:57 | Confusing sentence regarding Python example |