From: | CS DBA <cs_dba(at)consistentstate(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Problem query |
Date: | 2011-06-01 22:28:33 |
Message-ID: | 4DE6BD11.6060603@consistentstate.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On 06/01/2011 03:38 PM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> CS DBA<cs_dba(at)consistentstate(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> The app wants to run a query like this:
>>
>> select count(pri_num) from max_xtrv_st_t
>> where pri_num in (select max(pri_num) from max_xtrv_st_t where 1=1
>> group by tds_cx_ind, cxs_ind_2)
>
> Why not something simpler? There are a number of possibilities, and
> I don't claim this one is necessarily best (or even error free), but
> how about something like?:
>
> select count(*) from
> (select distinct max(pri_num)
> from max_xtrv_st_t
> group by tds_cx_ind, cxs_ind_2) x
>
> -Kevin
I've tried a number of alternates, each one wants to do a seq scan of
the table (including your suggestion above).
--
---------------------------------------------
Kevin Kempter - Constent State
A PostgreSQL Professional Services Company
www.consistentstate.com
---------------------------------------------
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | panam | 2011-06-01 22:49:31 | Re: [PERFORM] Hash Anti Join performance degradation |
Previous Message | CS DBA | 2011-06-01 22:26:57 | Re: Problem query |