From: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | postgres performance list <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: serveRAID M5014 SAS |
Date: | 2011-05-25 14:00:49 |
Message-ID: | 4DDD0B91.9080300@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz wrote:
> Does anyone here have any bad experiences with the RAID card in subject ?
> This is in an IBM server, with 2.5" 10k drives.
>
> But we seem to observe its poor performance in other configurations as
> well (with different drives, different settings) in comparison with -
> say, what dell provides.
>
Older ServeRAID cards have never been reported as very fast. They were
an OK controller if you just want to mirror a pair of drives or
something simple like that. Their performance on larger RAID arrays is
terrible compared to the LSI products that Dell uses.
However, the M5014 *is* an LSI derived product, with a proper
battery-backed write cache and everything. I'm not sure if older views
are even useful now. Few things to check:
-Is the battery working, and the write cache set in write-back mode?
-Has read-ahead been set usefully?
-Did you try to use a more complicated RAID mode than this card can handle?
Those are the three easiest ways to trash performance here.
--
Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.us
"PostgreSQL 9.0 High Performance": http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/books
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2011-05-25 14:54:00 | Re: serveRAID M5014 SAS |
Previous Message | Vitalii Tymchyshyn | 2011-05-25 08:51:57 | Re: [PERFORMANCE] expanding to SAN: which portion best to move |