Re: Seg-fault in format(text)

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Seg-fault in format(text)
Date: 2011-05-23 18:02:14
Message-ID: 4DDAA126.50209@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On 23.05.2011 18:36, Tom Lane wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas<heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
>> It's a stretch that we'd ever support two billion arguments in any form,
>> but an explicit check for "arg< 0" would make me feel better.
>
> No objection here, especially since I've just determined that bug #6035
> is also some kind of unhandled-overflow problem...
>
> Do you want to take care of this one?

Ok.

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martin A. Brooks 2011-05-23 18:44:11 Re: BUG #6028: age() function output contracts "months", but not any other units.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-05-23 18:02:04 Re: BUG #6028: age() function output contracts "months", but not any other units.