| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Scaling |
| Date: | 2011-05-12 21:04:48 |
| Message-ID: | 4DCC4B70.9020803@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On 04/24/2011 03:21 PM, David Hornsby wrote:
> My SMB database is currently running on a HP-UX box running in a master
> - slave slonyI cluster to create a hot spare database. Recently the
> server has be getting hammered and we are consistently hitting our max
> db connections. We have our web CMS and our web apps, our desktop client
> apps, and a couple application servers running off of this database
> server and it is crumbling under the stress. Currently we have been
> doing table partitioning and table archiving to trim the fat off of the
> indexing processes etc.
>
> My project at hand is to upgrade this configuration to a linux cluster
> of servers, 2 - 3. The ideal solution is to just do load balancing
> through DNS requests and have 2 servers in a multi master configuration.
> So far we have not had any hardware issues on our current set up ( knock
> on wood). So in doing this I am not immediately looking for a hot spare
> set up. But in the future am looking at setting up a VPN tunnel to an
> offsite server and sending WAL updates to that.
You are more likely to need one master, two hot standbys and push your
reads to the slaves.
JD
--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development
The PostgreSQL Conference - http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
@cmdpromptinc - @postgresconf - 509-416-6579
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tim | 2011-05-12 22:38:24 | Re: Postgres Incremental Bakcup |
| Previous Message | Neal Brown | 2011-05-12 20:46:42 | cacti graph templates for check_postgres --dbstats |