Re: Effects of GUC settings on automatic replans

From: Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Effects of GUC settings on automatic replans
Date: 2007-03-24 17:20:35
Message-ID: 4DCB6439-B0B2-4654-9040-B94AFADD054F@decibel.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mar 21, 2007, at 5:11 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> constraint_exclusion
>
> I'm inclined not to worry about these, since changing them can't
> affect
> the semantics of the query, at worst its performance.

Hrm... wasn't that option added in case there was a bug in the
exclusion code? I certainly can't think of any performance reason why
you'd want to disable it... so it might be worth invalidating plans
if it changes.
--
Jim Nasby jim(at)nasby(dot)net
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-03-24 18:00:30 Idea for cleaner representation of snapshots
Previous Message Jim Nasby 2007-03-24 17:12:25 Vacation