| From: | "Jehan-Guillaume (ioguix) de Rorthais" <ioguix(at)free(dot)fr> |
|---|---|
| To: | Rob Wultsch <wultsch(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | damien clochard <damien(at)dalibo(dot)info>, Roy Hann <specially(at)processed(dot)almost(dot)meat>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory |
| Date: | 2011-05-05 15:47:11 |
| Message-ID: | 4DC2C67F.3040501@free.fr |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
On 05/05/2011 17:36, Rob Wultsch wrote:
> On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 5:36 AM, Jehan-Guillaume (ioguix) de Rorthais
> <ioguix(at)free(dot)fr> wrote:
>> Yeah, but volatile means « lost on shutdown », which is not the case here
>> during a clean shutdown.
>
> Isn't that how the table should be treated though?
sure.
But imho, this "volatile tables" implies too many wrong ideas:
* lost on clean shutdown
* only in memory (sounds familiar)
* not on disk
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua Berkus | 2011-05-05 17:09:46 | Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory |
| Previous Message | Rob Wultsch | 2011-05-05 15:36:33 | Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2011-05-05 15:54:01 | Re: adding a new column in IDENTIFY_SYSTEM |
| Previous Message | Rob Wultsch | 2011-05-05 15:36:33 | Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory |