From: | Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules Bernd Helmle |
Date: | 2009-01-23 23:26:40 |
Message-ID: | 4DC0DD6D8B034EFC7EF998F2@amenophis |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
--On 23. Januar 2009 18:02:55 -0500 Jaime Casanova
<jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> wrote:
> to be honest, i feel like that was commented in the last (or the last
> before the last) release cycle well this patch originally appears.
I know that i've changed something in the operator lookup code regarding
some discussions last year, but i can't remember. Anyways, we have to fix
it in some other way.
And of course, CTID looks like a mess (and i'm sure there are much more
issues with them than we can imagine now, because it's in some direction
theoretically much the same problem as multi action rules).
Bernd
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bernd Helmle | 2009-01-23 23:53:10 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules Bernd Helmle |
Previous Message | Bernd Helmle | 2009-01-23 23:18:20 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules Bernd Helmle |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bernd Helmle | 2009-01-23 23:53:10 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules Bernd Helmle |
Previous Message | Bernd Helmle | 2009-01-23 23:18:20 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules Bernd Helmle |