From: | Adarsh Sharma <adarsh(dot)sharma(at)orkash(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: The right SHMMAX and FILE_MAX |
Date: | 2011-05-02 04:53:15 |
Message-ID: | 4DBE38BB.7040106@orkash.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
I am also in need of a proper documentation that explains how to set
SHMAX and SHMALL variables in Postgres.
What things need to be taken in consideration before doing that ?
What is the value of SHMAX & SHMALL if u have 16 GB RAM for Postgres
Server ?
Thanks
Phoenix Kiula wrote:
> Hi. I'm on a 64 Bit CentOS 5 system, quadcore processor, 8GB RAM and
> tons of data storage (1 TB SATAII disks).
>
> The current SHMMAX and SHMMIN are (commas added for legibility) --
>
> kernel.shmmax = 68,719,476,736
> kernel.shmall = 4,294,967,296
>
> Now, according to my reading in the PG manual and this list, a good
> recommended value for SHMMAX is
>
> (shared_buffers * 8192)
>
> My postgresql.conf settings at the moment are:
>
> max_connections = 300
> shared_buffers = 300MB
> effective_cache_size = 2000MB
>
> By this calculation, shared_b * 8192 will be:
>
> 2,457,600,000,000
>
> That's a humongous number. So either the principle for SHMMAX is
> amiss, or I am reading this wrongly?
>
> Similarly with "fs.file_max". There are articles like this one:
> http://tldp.org/LDP/solrhe/Securing-Optimizing-Linux-RH-Edition-v1.3/chap6sec72.html
>
> Is this relevant for PostgreSQL performance at all, or should I skip that?
>
> Thanks for any pointers!
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Claudio Freire | 2011-05-02 07:58:40 | Re: Query improvement |
Previous Message | Greg Smith | 2011-05-01 23:31:15 | Re: stored proc and inserting hundreds of thousands of rows |