From: | John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | bkrug(at)usatech(dot)com |
Subject: | Re: BUG #5996: CURRENT_TIMESTAMP uses often undesired TRANSACTION_TIMESTAMP, instead of STATEMENT_TIMESTAMP |
Date: | 2011-04-29 05:34:35 |
Message-ID: | 4DBA4DEB.8090305@hogranch.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On 04/28/11 12:33 PM, Brian S. Krug wrote:
> The following bug has been logged online:
>
> Bug reference: 5996
> Logged by: Brian S. Krug
> Email address: bkrug(at)usatech(dot)com
> PostgreSQL version: 9.0.3
> Operating system: Solaris
> Description: CURRENT_TIMESTAMP uses often undesired
> TRANSACTION_TIMESTAMP, instead of STATEMENT_TIMESTAMP
> Details:
>
> CURRENT_TIMESTAMP (and CURRENT_DATE, CURRENT_TIME) return the time of the
> start of the transcaction - which seems to be right after the end of the
> last transaction. Thus, if you use pooled connections, CURRENT_TIMESTAMP
> will return the time of the last COMMIT. This is often unintended behavior.
> This tripped me up significant and I would anticipate that many have fallen
> into the same trap. I recommend that CURRENT_TIMESTAMP functions as
> STATEMENT_TIMESTAMP instead of as TRANSACTION_TIMESTAMP.
>
Transactions start when you issue a BEGIN; command. If you don't issue
a BEGIN, then every statement is a self contained transaction. Are you
using a runtime abstraction thats doing this automagically behind your
back right after COMMIT; ? if so, thats your problem.
old JDBC's did exactly that, and it caused other ugly problems like long
running IDLE In Transaction processes.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michiel | 2011-04-29 08:07:02 | BUG #5997: [queryplan] PostgreSQL is sorting the query results when the result can only be 1 item. |
Previous Message | Brian S. Krug | 2011-04-28 19:33:13 | BUG #5996: CURRENT_TIMESTAMP uses often undesired TRANSACTION_TIMESTAMP, instead of STATEMENT_TIMESTAMP |