Re: unknown conversion %m

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: unknown conversion %m
Date: 2011-04-27 14:59:04
Message-ID: 4DB7E8E8020000250003CF37@gw.wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:

> What I'd like to know is why it doesn't complain elsewhere.

It appears to be allowed as an "extension" on some compliers.

http://sourceware.org/ml/newlib/2006/msg00079.html

-Kevin

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-04-27 15:02:05 Re: unknown conversion %m
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2011-04-27 14:53:42 Re: unknown conversion %m