| From: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Robert Treat <rob(at)xzilla(dot)net>, Jeremy Schneider <schneider(at)ardentperf(dot)com>, Michael Banck <mbanck(at)gmx(dot)net>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Reports on obsolete Postgres versions |
| Date: | 2024-04-02 20:48:28 |
| Message-ID: | 4DB71528-0135-408C-B3F1-005D4A81F219@yesql.se |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On 2 Apr 2024, at 22:46, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 11:34:46AM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> I do like the term "current" better. It conveys (at least a bit) that we
>> really consider all the older ones to be, well, obsolete. The difference
>> "current vs obsolete" is stronger than "latest vs not quite latest".
>
> Okay, I changed "superseded" to "old", and changed "latest" to
> "current", patch attached.
+1, LGTM
--
Daniel Gustafsson
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Melanie Plageman | 2024-04-02 20:54:28 | Re: Combine Prune and Freeze records emitted by vacuum |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2024-04-02 20:46:58 | Re: Reports on obsolete Postgres versions |