| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: branching for 9.2devel |
| Date: | 2011-04-25 13:29:41 |
| Message-ID: | 4DB57745.2090708@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 04/25/2011 09:17 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> The recent and wide-ranging "formatting curmudgeons" thread included
> suggestions by Tom and myself that we should consider branching the
> tree immediately after beta1.
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-04/msg01157.php
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-04/msg01162.php
>
> This didn't get much commentary, but others have expressed support for
> similar ideas in the past, so perhaps we should do it? Comments?
>
>
I am on record in the past as supporting earlier branching.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-04-25 13:52:53 | Re: SSI non-serializable UPDATE performance |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2011-04-25 13:21:20 | Re: make check in contrib |