Re: "stored procedures"

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: "stored procedures"
Date: 2011-04-22 22:00:00
Message-ID: 4DB1B410020000250003CC1B@gw.wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> hm, another neat thing about this is that it skirts the
> unfortunate confusion between sql 'begin' and plpgsql 'begin'...

I hadn't thought about that. There is the SQL-standard START
TRANSACTION synonym, so there is a way to deal with it -- but since
BEGIN seems to be used more heavily there would clearly be
confusion.

-Kevin

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dan Ports 2011-04-22 22:07:34 SSI non-serializalbe UPDATE performance (was: getting to beta)
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2011-04-22 21:52:09 Re: "stored procedures"