Re: EOL for 8.2 (was Re: Formatting Curmudgeons WAS: MMAP Buffers)

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Dan Ports <drkp(at)csail(dot)mit(dot)edu>, Kevin Grittner <kevin(dot)grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, cbbrowne <cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com>, greg <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: EOL for 8.2 (was Re: Formatting Curmudgeons WAS: MMAP Buffers)
Date: 2011-04-21 21:31:52
Message-ID: 4DB0A248.5040304@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 04/21/2011 05:17 PM, Greg Stark wrote:
> what version of Postgres was shipped in the last supported
> releases of major distributions? I think it was 8.1 in Ubuntu Hardy
> and 8.4 in Ubuntu Lucid so that's irrelevant. What about Redhat and
> Debian?

IIRC RedHat has a ten year EOL policy, so what they have shipped in old
releases should not really bind us. In any case, our EOL policy only
affects what formal releases we make. We can commit fixes to branches
past their EOL date, and IIRC Tom did this not long ago.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Darren Duncan 2011-04-21 21:48:02 Re: "stored procedures"
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-04-21 21:31:04 Re: EOL for 8.2 (was Re: Formatting Curmudgeons WAS: MMAP Buffers)