Re: Build farm coverage for isolation tests

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Build farm coverage for isolation tests
Date: 2011-04-20 13:54:55
Message-ID: 4DAE9F5F020000250003CA57@gw.wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:

>
http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_stage_log.pl?nm=crake&dt=2011-04-20%2010%3A17%3A02&stg=isolation-check

On a cursory scan, that looks like a successful run of the right
test suite. Was there anything in particular I should be checking
there?

> I'll include this in the upcoming release of the buildfarm client.

Thanks!

This will only be attempted for 9.1 or higher, right?

-Kevin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2011-04-20 13:54:56 Re: pgbench \for or similar loop
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-04-20 13:49:08 Re: database system identifier differs between the primary and standby