Re: Intel SSDs that may not suck

From: David Boreham <david_list(at)boreham(dot)org>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Intel SSDs that may not suck
Date: 2011-04-07 03:52:03
Message-ID: 4D9D34E3.9090909@boreham.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On 4/6/2011 9:19 PM, gnuoytr(at)rcn(dot)com wrote:
> SSDs have been around for quite some time. The first that I've found is Texas Memory. Not quite 1977, but not flash either, although they've been doing so for a couple of years.
Well, I built my first ram disk (which of course I thought I had
invented, at the time) in 1982.
But today we're seeing solid state storage seriously challenging
rotating media across all applications, except at the TB and beyond
scale. That's what's new.

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jesper Krogh 2011-04-07 04:27:57 Re: Intel SSDs that may not suck
Previous Message gnuoytr 2011-04-07 03:19:50 Re: Intel SSDs that may not suck