Re: getting to beta

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: getting to beta
Date: 2011-04-06 16:06:56
Message-ID: 4D9C8FA0.1030602@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 06.04.2011 18:02, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas<robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> I agree. But again, that's not really what I'm focusing on - the
>> collations stuff, the typed tables patch, and SSI all need serious
>> looking at, and I'm not sure who is going to pick all that up.
>
> Well, I'll take responsibility for collations. If I get done with that
> before the 14th, I can see what's up with typed tables. I'm not willing
> to do anything with SSI at this stage.

I can look at the SSI patches, but not until next week, I'm afraid.
Robert, would you like to pick that up before then? Kevin & Dan have
done all the heavy lifting, but it's nevertheless pretty complicated
code to review.

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-04-06 16:13:24 Re: GUC assign hooks (was Re: wal_buffers = -1 and SIGHUP)
Previous Message Noah Misch 2011-04-06 15:49:18 Re: Typed-tables patch broke pg_upgrade