From: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: getting to beta |
Date: | 2011-04-06 16:06:56 |
Message-ID: | 4D9C8FA0.1030602@enterprisedb.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 06.04.2011 18:02, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas<robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> I agree. But again, that's not really what I'm focusing on - the
>> collations stuff, the typed tables patch, and SSI all need serious
>> looking at, and I'm not sure who is going to pick all that up.
>
> Well, I'll take responsibility for collations. If I get done with that
> before the 14th, I can see what's up with typed tables. I'm not willing
> to do anything with SSI at this stage.
I can look at the SSI patches, but not until next week, I'm afraid.
Robert, would you like to pick that up before then? Kevin & Dan have
done all the heavy lifting, but it's nevertheless pretty complicated
code to review.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-04-06 16:13:24 | Re: GUC assign hooks (was Re: wal_buffers = -1 and SIGHUP) |
Previous Message | Noah Misch | 2011-04-06 15:49:18 | Re: Typed-tables patch broke pg_upgrade |