From: | Susanne Ebrecht <susanne(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Gabriele Bartolini <gabriele(dot)bartolini(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)it>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Uppercase SGML entity declarations |
Date: | 2011-04-04 17:26:45 |
Message-ID: | 4D99FF55.9070301@2ndQuadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
On 04.04.2011 18:37, Tom Lane wrote:
> AFAIK, the main stumbling block for that is that XML doesn't allow
> abbreviated close tags (ie,<foo>whatever</>). Which is something that
> we are not likely to give up. So I'm not sure of the point of changing
> something as trivial as entity declaration casing. You're going to end
> up having to fork the documentation anyway, or at least feed it through
> an SGML to XML converter. So why not fix the entity casing then?
Tom,
Honestly, for German I don't mind yet if it is XML or SGML. XML might
be better in future for maintenance tools.
Anyway, I figured out there is another argument for XML:
My information is that DocBook 5.0 won't support SGML anymore.
Which means - sooner or later a reaction is needed.
Susanne
P.S.:
Btw. I change <foo>whatever</> into <foo>whatever</foo> when it
is in the parts which I am translating because my emacs indent don't
like </>.
--
Susanne Ebrecht - 2ndQuadrant
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
www.2ndQuadrant.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-04-04 17:28:47 | Re: [HACKERS] Uppercase SGML entity declarations |
Previous Message | Gabriele Bartolini | 2011-04-04 17:18:21 | Re: [HACKERS] Uppercase SGML entity declarations |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-04-04 17:28:47 | Re: [HACKERS] Uppercase SGML entity declarations |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-04-04 17:26:12 | Re: [sepgsql] missing checks of process:transition on trusted procedure invocation |