Dan Ports <drkp(at)csail(dot)mit(dot)edu> wrote:
> There's no urgent need to have this, although it's obviously more
> correct than the current behavior. It might be useful for
> debugging.
Agreed all around. For the benefit of the more casual follower of
the thread, attached is a simple example of the output. For the
SIReadLock rows, the pid column shows as empty without the patch.
-Kevin