Re: Shouldn't we have a way to avoid "risky" plans?

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: postgres performance list <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Shouldn't we have a way to avoid "risky" plans?
Date: 2011-03-23 20:29:17
Message-ID: 4D8A581D.5080704@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On 3/23/11 10:35 AM, Claudio Freire wrote:
> * consider plan bailout: execute a tempting plan, if it takes too
> long or its effective cost raises well above the expected cost, bail
> to a safer plan

That would actually solve this particular case. It would still require
us to have some definition of "safer" though.

--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Claudio Freire 2011-03-23 20:46:19 Re: Shouldn't we have a way to avoid "risky" plans?
Previous Message Laszlo Nagy 2011-03-23 20:29:16 Slow query on CLUTER -ed tables