| From: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Comments on SQL/Med objects |
| Date: | 2011-03-23 17:13:32 |
| Message-ID: | 4D8A2A3C.7070709@lelarge.info |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Le 23/03/2011 17:53, Tom Lane a écrit :
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
>> <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
>>> While working on adding support for SQL/Med objects to pgAdmin, I'm
>>> quite surprised to see there is no way to add comments to SQL/Med
>>> objects. Is this on purpose or is it just something that was simply missed?
>
>> I think it's an oversight. We should probably fix this.
>
> Yeah, I had a private TODO about that. I'd like to see if we can
> refactor the grammar to eliminate some of the duplication there
> as well as the potential for oversights of this sort. I believe
> that USER MAPPINGs are missing from ObjectType as well as a bunch
> of other basic places ...
>
OK, great. Thanks for your answers.
--
Guillaume
http://www.postgresql.fr
http://dalibo.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim Nasby | 2011-03-23 17:53:00 | Re: 2nd Level Buffer Cache |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-03-23 16:53:46 | Re: Comments on SQL/Med objects |