From: | "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
---|---|
To: | "Dan Ports" <drkp(at)csail(dot)mit(dot)edu>, "YAMAMOTO Takashi" <yamt(at)mwd(dot)biglobe(dot)ne(dot)jp>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: SSI bug? |
Date: | 2011-03-18 21:57:32 |
Message-ID: | 4D838EFC020000250003BB12@gw.wicourts.gov |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> wrote:
> I'm still looking at whether it's sane to try to issue a warning
> when an HTAB exceeds the number of entries declared as its
> max_size when it was created.
I think this does it.
If nothing else, it might be instructive to use it while testing the
SSI patch. Would it make any sense to slip this into 9.1, or should
I add it to the first 9.2 CF?
-Kevin
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
htab-excess-warning.patch | text/plain | 2.6 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2011-03-18 22:41:35 | pgsql: Document the all-balls IPv6 address. |
Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2011-03-18 21:48:33 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Efficient transaction-controlled synchronous replication. |