From: | Jo <jl(dot)news(at)uni-bonn(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz |
Cc: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Postgres 8.3 vs. 8.4 - Query plans and performance |
Date: | 2011-03-14 16:04:50 |
Message-ID: | 4D7E3CA2.30807@uni-bonn.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hello,
that's the 8.4 query plan:
http://explain.depesz.com/s/dO7
The locale of the two databases is the same:
SHOW LC_COLLATE command gives the locale: "de_DE.UTF-8".
Regards,
Jo
On 14.03.2011 16:04, tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz wrote:
>> Hello
>>
>> 2011/3/14 Jo<jl(dot)news(at)uni-bonn(dot)de>:
>>> I set the work_mem to 100MB and the shared buffers are 2 GB
>>>
>>> The query plans are long and complex. I send the beginning of the
>>> two plans. Hope this helps to understand the differences.
>>> I assume the join strategy in 8.3 differs from the one in 8.4.
>>>
>>
>> these outputs are not too helpful - send a EXPLAIN ANALYZE result
>>
>> you can use a small aplication for storing plans
>> http://explain.depesz.com/
>
> I'm afraid he won't be able to provide EXPLAIN ANALYZE as the second query
> (on 8.4) does not finish. But providing a full EXPLAIN output is
> definitely a good idea - there's no way to solve that using just a piece
> of it.
>
> regards
> Tomas
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andy Colson | 2011-03-14 16:24:27 | Re: Select for update with offset interferes with concurrent transactions |
Previous Message | Raymond O'Donnell | 2011-03-14 16:03:45 | Re: Primary key |