Re: Theory of operation of collation patch

From: Susanne Ebrecht <susanne(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Theory of operation of collation patch
Date: 2011-03-08 14:46:48
Message-ID: 4D764158.50303@2ndQuadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 07.03.2011 17:43, Tom Lane wrote:
> because two expressions that are equal() must necessarily have the same collation
> property.

Peter, Tom,

I am not able to see this.

If 'abc' == 'abc' is not collation depending at all. It is only
encoding depending.

Collation is only needed for upper(), lower() and sorting.
Means it tells if e.g. upper('i') will get Y or I.
It tells if the German s-umlaut will be sorted together with 's' or
after 'z'.

Btw. the follows on implementing collations will be different -
and I hope Peter is aware of it.

My experience is that a huge follow will be that users will complain
that the
sorting isn't correct even when it is correct.

Susanne

--
Susanne Ebrecht - 2ndQuadrant
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
www.2ndQuadrant.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thom Brown 2011-03-08 15:01:11 Re: [HACKERS] Sync rep doc corrections
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2011-03-08 14:39:56 Re: Beginner question: Hacking environment?